The “Battle of the Apples” sounds like something that could happen at a farmer’s market. Instead, it was a series of expensive lawsuits that spanned nearly 30 years and involved some of the biggest names in entertainment and technology: namely, the Beatles and Steve Jobs.
The story goes that George Harrison was the one who first heard of Apple Computer, just after the company was founded in 1977. He alerted the staff of Apple Corps, the company the four Beatles had created in 1968 as a boutique/movie studio/electronics tinkerer/tax shelter that also served as a record label. That last division of Apple was the only one that really survived, mostly through releasing (and re-releasing) continually popular Beatles music.
In 1978, Apple Corps sued Apple Computer for violating its trademark. The two reached a settlement in ’81, agreeing that they could co-exist by functioning in separate spheres. Corps would stick to entertainment while Computer would stick to, well, computers. Jobs’ technology company also paid $80,000 for the rights to keep the Apple name.
But that wouldn’t be the last time the two Apples would try to take a bite out of each other. As the ’80s continued, computers became more complicated, increasing the range of tasks a typical Apple machine could achieve. Multiple products in Apple’s Macintosh line were engineered for music creation and playback, something the folks at Apple Corps thought violated the two corporations’ 1981 settlement. Not long after Apple Computer announced the Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI), which allowed computers to interact with musical instruments, the Beatles’ record label sued again.
Apple Computer “agreed that they would not use or register their marks for any equipment which had been … ‘specifically adapted for use in the recording or reproduction of music,’” Beatles attorney Nicholas Valner told the Los Angeles Times in 1991, after the trial had already dragged on for more than nine months. “In other words, if they made a computer that could do that, they couldn’t call it an Apple. They’d have to call it an Orange or something like that.”
Christopher Escher, a spokesman for the technology company, meanwhile suggested that the computers were capable of all sorts of functions and that music was a tiny slice of that pie. Apple computers are “general purpose productivity tools,” he explained. They can do “lots of different things. They’re computers with sound capabilities.”
The litigation halted production on multiple products for Apple Computer, which feared a loss in this lawsuit would stop it from ever releasing another machine capable of doing anything music-related. Many employees were bitter about the courtroom fight. It is not a coincidence that an alert sound in the Macintosh’s 1991 operating system was titled Sosumi (“so sue me”).
Read More: 25 Years Ago: The Beatles' Apple Corps Reaches a New Settlement with Apple Computer | http://ultimateclassicrock.com/apple-corp-apple-computers-second-settlement/?trackback=tsmclip